Sunday, October 28, 2012

Obama Fires Top Admiral As Coup Plot Fears Grow


The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Sorcha Faal: Obama Fires Top Admiral As Coup Plot Fears Grow
Posted By: Jordon [Send E-Mail]
Date: Sunday, 28-Oct-2012 06:39:50

.
A shocking new report prepared by the Foreign Military Intelligence Main Directorate (GRU) of the General Staff of the Armed Forces, and circulating in the Kremlin today, states that President Obama has fired one of the United States Navy’s most powerful Admirals over growing fears the US Military is planning an overthrow of his government.

According to this report, yesterday (27 October) Obama ordered the immediate removal of Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette [photo 2nd left] from his command of the powerful Carrier Strike Group Three (CSG-3) [photo 3rd left] currently located in the Middle East.
CSG-3 is one of five US Navy carrier strike groups currently assigned to the US Pacific Fleet. US Navy carrier strike groups are employed in a variety of roles, which involve gaining and maintaining sea control and projecting power ashore, as well as projecting naval airpower ashore.
The aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis (CVN-74) is the strike group's current flagship, and as of 2012, other units assigned to Carrier Strike Group Three include Carrier Air Wing Nine; the guided-missile cruisers USS Mobile Bay (CG-53) and USS Antietam (CG-54); and the ships of Destroyer Squadron 21, the guided-missile destroyers USS Wayne E. Meyer (DDG-108), USS Dewey (DDG-105), USS Kidd (DDG-100), and USS Milius (DDG-69).
US news reports on Obama’s unprecedented firing of a powerful US Navy Commander during wartime state that Admiral Gaouette’s removal was for “allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment” that arose during the strike group’s deployment to the Middle East.
This GRU report, however, states that Admiral Gaouette’s firing by President Obama was due to this strike force commander disobeying orders when he ordered his forces on 11 September to “assist and provide intelligence for” American military forces ordered into action by US Army General Carter Ham, who was then the commander of the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM), against terrorist forces attacking the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
Read more: http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1621.htm

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Whats the problem with nobama? Pissed because his plan got screwed up because of brave soldiers that came to the rescue ! This idoit needs to be impeached NOW!!!!

Anonymous said...

General Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place.
General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.
General Ham then received the order to…… “stand down”. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow.
Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now……. “relieved of his command”.

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD BEHIND BENGHAZI ATTACK WITH LINK TO OBAMA
http://www.westernjournalism.com/muslim-brotherhood-behind-benghazi-attack-with-link-to-obama/

read the COMMENTS on this story: NAVY REPLACES ADMIRAL LEADING MIDEAST STRIKE GROUP BECAUSE OF ONGOING INVESTIGATION
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/navy-replaces-admiral-leading-mideast-strike-group-because-of-ongoing-investigation/

Anonymous said...

Impeachment is for real presidents. How ironic, he blames everyone on anyone but he has no one to blame this on this time. Oh maybe he'll blame it on psuedo prez Valerie.

Anonymous said...

If I had been a member of the crew on that ship and General Ham had been overtaken by the second in command, I would have been demanding to know WHY THE REST OF THE CREW DID NOT OVERTAKE THE SECOND IN COMMAND? WHERE OR WHERE IS THAT 75% to 85% of the US military that is supposed to be on the side of restoring our Republic and taking down the traitors in ALL positions in this rogue make believe 'government' and the military serving it? How is it that the second in command was not arrested by the entire crew on board and put in the clink? We have been told on Wednesday evenings and Sundays at noon that the US military "IS ON OUR SIDE." Some how this situation clearly yells to us otherwise. Our military guys needed help ASAP and the traitorous 'president' and the second in command on board that ship BOTH DENIED the requested assistance with the support of the entire crew. The ONLY one who was willing to respond with assistance was the General. NOW WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU AMERICANS????

Anonymous said...

GEN Ham needs to go public and pronto. Yeah, he'll face a a year of painful consequences but he'll be an American hero and will do plenty well on the speaking circuit as the 4-Star who finally had enough of the sycophants surrounding President Oblahblah.